Animals -> Fish -> Freshwater Fish -> Pike

Pike

Pike are reported to have been eaten by Kaska (of Upper Liard and Dease River), Champagne and Aishihik, Inland Tlingit, Teslin Tlingit, Tutchone, Tagish, Tanana, Koyukon, Han, Ingalik, Tanaina, Yupik of Southwest Alaska, Chipewyan, Dene/Metis of Fort Good Hope, Colville Lake, Wood Buffalo National Park, Moose-Deer Island House People (Dene), Hare (Sahtu), Fort Nelson Slave (Sahtu), Dogrib, Kutchin (Gwich’in) (including the Chandalar Kutchin, Crow River Kutchin, Yukon Flats Kutchin, Chalkyitsik Kutchin, Vunta Kutchin), Inuvialuit of Aklavik and Kugaluk, Inuit of Coronation Gulf, Anishnabeg Ojibway (Anishinabek), Saulteaux, Muscago, Cree (including Red Earth Cree, Northern Manitoba Cree, Plains Cree, Omushkego Cree, Attawapiskat Cree, Eastmain Cree, Paint Hills Cree, Fort George Cree, James Bay Cree, Western Woods Cree, Waswanipi Cree, Mistissini Cree), Northern Iroquois, Huron, Attikamek and St. Lawrence River Montagnais (Innu) [1-62]. Although the species of pike involved was not often reported, in most localities and instances, northern pike is likely to have been the most commonly caught and eaten species, but other pike including muskellunge, chain pickerel, and grass pickerel were likely locally important in eastern North America. The Huron are specifically noted to have eaten muskellunge, caught primarily in spring during the spawning period, but also sometimes in fall in shallow waters [11].

In general, pike were usually caught in fall and winter, although a few cultures caught them in spring; the Waswanipi Cree concentrated their catch in spring. Pike were caught using nets, spears, traps and fishhooks depending on the season in which they were caught [9, 11, 12, 14, 21, 23, 26, 27, 31].

Mainland Southwest Alaskan Yupik (who caught them in the fall), Mistissini Cree and Tagish employed gill nets, while most Central River Yupik used spears in river ice holes during winter [12, 21, 31]. Yupik caught them in tundra lakes near the lower Kuskokwim, and the Tagish caught them in lakes including the Little Atlin Lake; the Tagish used cotton twine gill nets in ice holes [12, 31]. These nets were attached to wood floats and sinkers made of lead, sandbags or wood. In earlier times, they used nets made of sinew, which were attached to poles anchored in the lake bottom, and to unspecified kinds of floats and sinkers. While fishing they would put their hands into the water constantly in order to untangle the pike and place them on a pile. This type of fishing involved the job of “running the net”, subjecting one’s bare hands to air and water, thus one’s hands got quite cold. It was believed that “If one’s mother had rubbed one’s hands on a beaver skin during childhood, this would prevent cold hands”. The Tagish also caught pike by jigging in ice holes using baited hooks, many of them attached to a single line. The hook was a wood shaft attached to a bone or was a one-piece hook made from a moose’s nose bone. Before setting the hook, the fisherman is reported to have blown over it, rotating it in the air and to “speak to the fish for the hook” so: “I’ll bet you want to grab this in a hurry. That’s what your friend says to you!” Or he would address the hook directly as “my grandfather” and exhort it to catch some fish. The Tagish also sang a unique song while they jigged for pike, the song being considered as an “invitation for the fish to bite at the hook”. Tradition says that they learned this song from the “bad little fellow” who had lived one year in the stomach of a huge pike [12].

The Waswanipi, Tanaina and Inland Tlingit caught pike with hooks, among other methods [9, 12, 27]. The Waswanipi caught them in the winter using a hook and line in ice holes, but in May when they concentrated pike fishing, they are reported to shoot them in shallow weedy regions using .22 calibre rifles [9]. The Tanaina used bone hooks, and in later times metal ones. They also placed nets in ponds under-ice [27]. In the fall and spring, the Inland Tlingit used fish hooks covered with a white fish tail or a squirrel skin reversed inside out if the fish tail was unobtainable. This hook was made of a dry wood shank and a bone barb constructed from the second or fourth metatarsal of a moose. The barb was attached to the shank with the aid of babiche, which had been immersed in an ash and water mixture or a red alder and water mixture. In the spring, they also used sinew or twisted willow bark nets [12].

The Huron and Kutchin caught pike using spears; the Kutchin also using unbaited bone hooks [11, 23]. The Koyukon and Ingalik used traps at various seasons. Koyukon men caught pike in late fall by placing keyhole or basket traps, and in latter times, nets under river ice. The women caught them in April with nets while the men were engaged in hunting muskrat, beaver and waterfowl The Ingalik caught them in the winter by placing traps under ice and in spring by setting pike-run traps at fishing sites shared by a group of men. They also caught pike using a sinew line and a caribou bone hook, the line being connected to a short pole [14, 26].

Pike was eaten fresh or dried or frozen for later use [10, 12, 15]. The Southern Tutchone boiled the flesh for immediate consumption and dried or froze it, usually for dog food [12]. The Chandalar Kutchin, Saulteaux and Muscago dried the flesh for storage; the latter two cultures, hung them up by the tail to dry in the sun [10, 15]. The Inland Tlingit stored the fall catch frozen [12]. The Mistissini Cree also are reported to eat the head and pike fat, which they considered “good eating”. Pike was dressed in four different ways: 1) the fins were severed, the skin and scales removed, the head severed, the guts and coagulated blood taken out, and the tail severed and any remaining scales taken off, 2) the fins were removed, the carcass skinned, the head cut off, the guts removed and any remaining scales taken off, 3) for tiny pike, the fins were removed, the skin descaled, head severed, the guts and coagulated blood removed, and the tail severed, 4) if the skin was used to make grease containers, the skin around the base of the head was cut, and the skin peeled from the carcass from the anterior side [21]. The Cree of Fort George, Quebec used pike roe in making bannock [63].

Many cultures caught them in fall and/or winter, although some caught them in summer or spring. They caught them in lakes, ponds and rivers including the Medicine and Red Earth Lakes, and the Old Crow and Kuskokwim Rivers. They typically used nets to catch pike, though they also used hooks and arrows [12, 32, 33, 40, 41, 43, 47, 50, 52, 57, 59, 64]. The Chalkyitsik Kutchin of Alaska, Athapaskan of the Arctic drainage lowland, Vunta Kutchin, cultures of the far North, Hare (Sahtu), Cree of Fort George and Eastmain, Inland Tlingit and Attawapiskat Western Cree used nets; the Attawapiskat mostly used nets to catch the small ones and hooks to catch the big ones [12, 32, 33, 41, 50, 54, 57, 64]. Cultures of the far North used nets made of “jackfish twine” and the Inland Tlingit and Hare (Sahtu) Indians used fairly small-meshed gill nets. In particular, the Hare (Sahtu) Indians used 4 or 4.5 inch mesh gill nets which required a license, and which had to be renewed annually [54, 64]. The Cree of Fort George and Eastmain used gill nets which they placed in rocky coves [33]. The Peel River Kutchin and the Upper Liard Kaska used hooks and arrows respectively The arrows contained detachable flint points and were employed when the fish swam near shore [40, 51].

The Champagne and Aishihik, Vunta Gwich’in and Teslin Tlingit rarely ate Northern pike because they found it “too bony and its flesh too soft” [61]. The Chalkyitsik Kutchin of Alaska ate it, but considered the flesh to be “poor-tasting and too low in fat” [50]. The flesh was boiled, baked, roasted and dried [37, 49-51]. The liver, intestines, roe, esophagus and head were also eaten [50, 65, 66]. The Peel River Kutchin ate the flesh boiled and roasted, boiling the pieces in a basket of water using hot stones. They roasted it near a fire using a protecting log as an oven [51]. The Dogrib and the Chalkyitsik Kutchin of Alaska dried the flesh, the latter storing it in caches for later use [37, 50]. When preparing Northern pike, the Dogrib sliced it down one side of the backbone and through the stomach and removed the bones and viscera, leaving the head attached to the body. They dried the carcass on a stick with the head facing up [37]. When cleaning the fish, the Tagish gutted it but did not scale it because doing so would dry it. They froze the carcasses in outside caches for later use [12]. Cultures of the far North who ate Northern pike especially in May, the season when they were “fat and well-flavored” also used it as dog food [54]. The Hare (Sahtu) used it as dog food [64]. The reported Sahtu (Hareskin) Dene/Metis of Fort Good Hope and Colville Lake baked the flesh and ate the eggs, esophagus and head [49, 66]. The Cree of James Bay and the Chalkyitsik Kutchin ate the liver; the Chalkyitsik Kutchin considering the fried liver and intestines a delicacy [50, 65].

Because pike are a predatory fish, they contain more mercury than non-predatory fish. Mercury levels above that considered as safe have been found in the liver and flesh of Northern pike harvested in the fall from the James Bay Cree region. Northern pike caught in hydroelectric reservoirs such as the Opinaca reservoir, the nearest reservoir to the Eastmain Cree in James Bay, have been found to be more contaminated that those caught in natural lakes in the James Bay region [36, 65].

The Plains Cree are known to eat pike, which they sometimes called chief fish, catching them in the spring with weirs, and in the winter with spears at open areas in the river ice [42].

References

1.         Rogers ES: Aboriginal Ontario: historical perspectives on the First Nations. Toronto: Dundurn Press; 1994.

2.         Berkes F, Farkas CS: Eastern James Bay Cree Indians: Changing Patterns of Wild Food Use and Nutrition. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 1978, 7:155-172.

3.         Birket-Smith K: The Struggle For Food. In: Eskimos. edn. Rhodos: The Greenland Society with the support of The Carlsberg Foundation and The Ministry for Greenland; 1971: 75-113.

4.         Clifton JA, Cornell GL, McClurken JM: People of The Three Fires: The Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan. Grand Rapids, Michigan: The Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council; 1986.

5.         Crow JR, Obley PR: Han. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 506-509.

6.         Eidlitz K: Food and Emergency Food in the Circumpolar Area. In.; 1969.

7.         Elberg N, Hyman J, Hyman K, Salisbury RF: Not By Bread Alone: The Use of Subsistence Resources among James Bay Cree. In.; 1975.

8.         Feit HA: The Ethno-Ecology of the Waswanipi Cree; or How Hunters can Manage their Resources. In: Cultural Ecology. edn. Edited by Cox B: McClelland and Stewart; 1973: 115-125.

9.         Feit HA: Waswanipi Realities and Adaptations: Resource Management and Cognitive Structure. In.; 1978.

10.       Harmon DW. In: Sixteen Years in the Indian Country The Journal of DW Harmon. edn. Edited by Lamb WK. Toronto: The Macmillan Company of Canada Limited; 1957.

11.       Heidenreich CE: Huron. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 368-383.

12.       McClellan C: My Old People Say: An Ethnographic Survey of Southern Yukon Territory-Part 1. Ottawa: National Musems of Canada; 1975.

13.       McClellan C: Tutchone. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 493-498.

14.       McFadyen Clark A: Koyukon. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 582-590.

15.       McKennan RA: Getting a Living. In: The Chandalar Kutchin. edn. New York: Arctic Intitue of North America, Technical Paper No. 17; 1965.

16.       Morrison NE, Receveur O, Kuhnlein HV, Appavoo DM, Soueida R, Pierrot P: Contemporary Sahtu Dene/Metis use of traditional and market food. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 1995, 34(3):197-210.

17.       Nobmann ED, Mamleeva FY, Klachkova EV: A Comparison of the Diets of Siberian Chukotka and Alaska Native Adults and Recommendations for Improved Nutrition, a Survey of Selected Previous Studies. Arct Med Res 1994, 53:123-129.

18.       Preston RJ: East Main Cree. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 196-207.

19.       Rogers ES: Subsistence. In: The Hunting Group-Hunting Territory Complex among the Mistassini Indians. edn. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada Bulletin No. 195; 1963: 32-53.

20.       Rogers ES: Subsistence Areas of the Cree-Ojibwa of the Eastern Subarctic: A Preliminary Study. Contributions of Ethnology V 1967, No. 204:59-90.

21.       Rogers ES: The Quest for Food and Furs: The Mistassini Cree, 1953-1954, vol. 1st edition. Ottawa: National Musems of Canada; 1973.

22.       Rogers ES, Leacock E: Montagnais-Naskapi. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 169-189.

23.       Slobodin R: Kutchin. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 514-518.

24.       Smith JGE: Chipewyan. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 271-277.

25.       Smith JGE: Western Woods Cree. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 256-262.

26.       Snow JH: Ingalik. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 602-607.

27.       Townsend JB: Tanaina. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 623-628.

28.       Waldram JB: Hydroelectric Development and Dietary Delocalization in Northern Manitoba, Canada. Human Organization 1985, 44(1):41-49.

29.       Wein EE: Nutrient Intakes and Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians Near Wood Buffalo National Park. In.; 1989.

30.       Wein EE, Sabry JH: Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians in the Taiga. Arct Med Res 1988, 47(1):134-138.

31.       Vanstone JW: Mainland Southwest Alaskan Eskimo. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 5: Arctic. edn. Edited by Damas D. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.; 1984: 225-234.

32.       Balikci A: Game Distribution. In: Vunta Kutchin Social Change A Study of the People of Old Crow, Yukon Territory. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1963.

33.       Berkes F: An Investigation of Cree Indian Domestic Fisheries in Northern Quebec. Arctic 1979, 32(1):46-70.

34.       Berkes F, George PJ, Preston RJ, Hughes.A, Turner J, Cummins BD: Wildlife Harvesting and Sustainable Regional Native Economy in the Hudson and James Bay Lowland, Ontario. Arctic 1994, Vol. 47 No. 4:350-360.

35.       Campbell ML, Diamant RMF, Macpherson BD, Halladay JL: The Contemporary Food Supply of Three Northern Manitoba Cree Communities. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1997, 88(2):105-108.

36.       Girard M, Noel F, Dumont C: Varying mercury exposure with varying food source in a James Bay Cree community. Arctic Medical Research 1996, 55:69-74.

37.       Helm J, Lurie NO: The Subsistence Economy of the Dogrib Indians of Lac La Martre in the Mackenzie District of the Northwest Territories. Ottawa: Northern Co-ordination and Research Centre: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1961.

38.       Honigmann JJ: Ethnography and Acculturation of the Fort Nelson Slave, vol. Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 33. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1946.

39.       Honigmann JJ: Foodways in a Muskeg Community: An Anthropological Report on the Attawapiskat Indians. Ottawa: Northern Co-ordination and Research Centre, Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1948.

40.       Honigmann JJ: The Kaska Indians: An Ethnographic Reconstruction. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1954.

41.       Honigmann JJ: Fishing. In: Foodways in a Muskeg Community. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1961: 143-150.

42.       Mandelbaum DG: The Plains Cree: An Ethnographic, Historical, and Comparative Study, vol. 1st edition. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center; 1979.

43.       McClellan C: A History of the Yukon Indians; Part of the Land, Part of the Water. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre; 1987.

44.       McKennan RA: Economic Life. In: The Upper Tanana Indians. edn. New Haven: Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 55; 1959.

45.       McKennan RA: Tanana. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 562-568.

46.       McNulty GE, Gilbert L: Attikamek (Tete de Boule). In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 208-209.

47.       Meyer D: Appendix I: Plants, Animals and Climate; Appendix IV: Subsistence-Settlement Patterns. In: The Red Earth Crees, 1860-1960. Volume 1st edition, edn.: National Musem of Man Mercury Series; 1985: 175-185-200-223.

48.       Morrison DA: The Kugaluk Site and the Nuvorugmiut: The Archaeology and History of a Nineteenth-Century Mackenzie Inuit Society. Hull, Quebec: National Musems of Canada; 1988.

49.       Morrison N, Kuhnlein HV: Retinol Content of Wild Foods Consumed by the Sahtu (Hareskin) Dene/Metis. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1993, 6:10-23.

50.       Nelson RK: Hunters of the Northern Forest: Designs for Survival among the Alaskan Kutchin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1973.

51.       Osgood C: Material Culture: Food. In: Contributions to the Ethnography of the Kutchin. edn. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1936: 23-39.

52.       Osgood C: The Han Indians: A Compilation of Ethnographic and Historical Data on the Alaska-Yukon Boundary Area, vol. Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 74. New Haven: Department of Anthropology Yale University; 1971.

53.       Raby S, Bone RM, Shannon EN: An Historic and Ethnographic Account to the 1920's. In: The Chipewyan of The Stony Rapids Region; a study of their changing world with special attention focused upon caribou. Volume 1st edition, edn. Edited by Bone RM. Saskatoon: Institute for Northern Studies, University of Saskatchewan; 1973: 12-47.

54.       Russel F: Explorations in the Far North. In: Explorations in the Far North. edn. Iowa: University of Iowa; 1898.

55.       Stefansson V: My Life with the Eskimo. In: My Life with the Eskimo. edn. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1913.

56.       Tuck JA: Northern Iroquoian Prehistory. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 322-325.

57.       Vanstone JW: Athapaskan Adaptations: Hunters and Fishermen of the Subarctic Forests. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1974.

58.       Smith DM: Native Life in the Micro-Urban Years: Economic, Ecological And Socio-Political Problems For Adapting to Modern Life. In: Moose-Deer Island House People: A History of the Native People of Fort Resolution. Volume 1st edition, edn. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada; 1982: 145-159.

59.       Wadsworth G: The Arctic Eskimo: I. The Eskimos and their Origins. In: The Diet and Health of Isolated Populations. edn. Boca: CRC Press; 1984: 83-95.

60.       Wein EE, Freeman MMR: Inuvialuit Food Use and Food Preferences in Aklavik, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic Medical Research 1992, 51:159-172.

61.       Wein EE, Freeman MMR: Frequency of Traditional Food Use by Three Yukon First Nations Living in Four Communities. Arctic 1995, Vol. 48, No. 2:161-171.

62.       Tuck JA: Onondaga Iroquois PreHistory: A Study in Settlement Archaeology, vol. 1st edition. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press; 1971.

63.       Bauer G: Fort George Cookbook; 1967.

64.       Hara HS: The Hare Indians and Their World. In. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada; 1980: 95-147.

65.       Belinsky D, Kuhnlein HV, Yeboah F, Penn AF, Chan HM: Composition of fish consumed by the James Bay Cree. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1996, 9:148-162.

66.       Kuhnlein HV, Appavoo DM, Morrison N, Soueida R, Pierrot P: Use and nutrient composition of traditional Sahtu (Hareskin) Dene/Metis food. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1994, 7:144-157.

Pike represent a family of large and solitary freshwater fish including five species of the same genus found in North American waters: the northern pike (Esox lucius), the muskellunge (E. masquinongy), the chain pickerel (E. niger), and the grass pickerel (E. americanus). The Northern pike is the most common and widespread, occurring in all provinces and territories, except for the Maritimes and Newfoundland, while the muskellunge and pickerels occur only in eastern North America. The common name for pike is brochet.

Pike are known for being large and feisty fish. They are long and slender and have a large flat head with the lower jaw longer than the upper jaw, dorsal and anal fins placed far back on the body, and a forked tail. The muskellunge is the largest of pike, reaching a weight of up to 30 kg, and the pickerels are the smallest, rarely weighing more than 1 kg. The northern pike has fully scaled cheeks and their body is often marked by rows of pale coloured spots, while the muskellunge has only the upper half cheek scaled and often has dark vertical bars running from the head to the tail.

Pike are found in quiet and shallow waters with abundant vegetation where they can hide and wait for a prey to pass by. Some spawn in early spring when the ice is still covering the water, like the northern pike, while other spawn after the ice has disappeared, like the muskellunge. They eat mainly other fish, but can also feed on frogs, crayfish, and even on small birds and mammals.

Reference

Wooding FH: Lake, river and sea-run fishes of Canada. Madeira Park, BC, Canada: Harbour Publishing; 1997.

 

Images provided below were obtained from: Encyclopedia of Life. Available from http://www.eol.org.
Northern pike
Copyright United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Supplier: Animal Diversity Web
This map is based on occurrence records available through the GBIF network
Muskellunge
Copyright United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Supplier: Animal Diversity Web
This map is based on occurrence records available through the GBIF network
Chain pickerel
Copyright United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Supplier: Animal Diversity Web
This map is based on occurrence records available through the GBIF network
Grass pickerel
Copyright United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Supplier: Animal Diversity Web
This map is based on occurrence records available through the GBIF network