Animals -> Mammals -> Furbearers -> Lynx and Bobcat

Lynx and Bobcat

Lynx and Bobcat General

Lynx and Bobcat General

Lynx and bobcats, sometimes collectively referred to as wildcats, are closely related furbearers that are valued for both their fur and their tender meat.


Lynx is reported to have been hunted primarily for its fur, but was also a supplemental food source for many cultures, including the Bella Coola (Nuxalk), Tahltan of the Skitine Plateau, Omushkego Cree, Micmac (Mi'kmaq) of Newfoundland, Makkovik Inuit of Labrador [43-47]. The Tutchone, Tagish and Tlingit enjoyed lynx meat immensely and prepared grease from its fat [46]. Lynx is reported to have been eaten by the Nuxalk, but only infrequently [50].


Lynx hunting usually began in autumn, as was done by the Lillooet [17, 32]. When the weather turned cold, Okanagan men set traps for lynx [33]. Kaska women set traps for lynx in summer and winter, while Koyukon women and children snared lynx in fall [7]. Ahtna men hunted lynx in fall along the rivers [27]. The Peel River Kutchin (Gwich’in) of the Yukon and Alaska started the hunt in November and ended late spring. They broke up into small groups of families and hunted in specific areas. The Cross River Kutchin also hunted lynx in the latter part of fall into winter [4]. The Cree, Chipewyan and Métis of Wood Buffalo National Park began the lynx trapping season when rivers and lakes froze; the trappers left the community and returned in late December [21]. The Mistissini Cree hunted lynx in autumn and winter [6]. Omushkego Cree men and female heads of homes without adult men usually trapped lynx from October to March [45]. During winter, the lynx confined itself to a particular area of the land, but wandered during the spring mating season. In order to get the lynx to stay closer to camp in March and April, a hunter usually wrapped a scented rag on his snowshoes so that the lynx followed his footsteps near camp [48].

Lynx were usually trapped with baited snares. Kaska used a babiche (semi-tanned hide) snare placed in the middle of a semicircle of poles that were driven into the ground [18]. The Tahltan used two forms of snares. One was a tossing pole with rabbit skin rubbed with castoreum attached to the tip. This snare was put in front of a corral of small sticks. The other type of snare was tied to a very long sapling trunk placed on a rabbit trail where lynx are often found [9]. The Ingalik used tether snares [34]. The Eyak used snares attached to bushes [37].

The Plains Cree of Saskatchewan used a snare consisting of a noose made of twisted deer hide, which was hung from a tree. The bait was strategically located near a fencing of little sticks so that the only way that lynx could get to the bait was through the noose [35]. The Mistissini Cree used two types of baited snares with nooses. One was a stationary snare, which consisted of two poles driven into the ground. A crossbar with a noose in the centre was attached to the poles near the top of each pole. In order for the lynx to get the bait, it had to pass its head through the noose. The other type was the spring-pole snare.

The Tahltan used hide snares connected to tossing poles; the snares were positioned along paths or locales where rabbits hunted [46]. In earlier times, Yukon peoples including the Tutchone, Tagish and Tlingit trapped lynx using deadfalls or babiche snares, however traps or wire snares replaced these later. One of the snares was the toss pole snare, which consisted of a noose 12 inches from the ground, held in place at each end by a twig. An older type of snare was the drag pole snare, which was placed at the opening of a brush enclosure or a tree trunk. The bait used for these older snares was a piece of rabbit or squirrel skin to which beaver castor was applied [48].

Other cultures that used snares included the Interior Salish of British Columbia, Gitksan (Gitxsan), Ahtna and Cree, Chipewyan and Métis of Wood Buffalo National Park [21, 25, 38, 39].

For the more modern wire snares, the bait consisted of fish tails, grouse feathers and coloured bits of wax paper. More recently, hunters used a commercial scent to treat their bait, but the majority still favored beaver castor [48]. In more recent times, steel traps have been used [6, 36].Younger hunters often used commercial number 3 steel traps; even though the number 2 trap is strong enough to catch a lynx, the stronger and bigger number 3 trap was usually used in case a wolverine was captured instead. Before use, the snares and traps were soaked in lake water in fall to “cure” them. They were usually placed along the corners of willow patches. The Mistissini Cree also used lynx traps: flesh from a hare or sometimes the hare’s head was used as bait [36].

Lynx were also captured with pitfalls and deadfalls. The Spokane used pitfalls and deadfalls to catch lynx; the Kalispel, Kotzebue Sound Inupiat and Lillooet reportedly used only deadfalls to hunt lynx [17, 32, 40-42]. Ahtna also used a deadfall to capture lynx [27]. The Okanagan used a snare of a heavy four-foot long pole with a heavy load at one end and bait on the other; the pole would hit the lynx on its head when it took the bait [33].


The Kaska cooked lynx for immediate use and also preserved it. The main method of preparation was boiling. It was boiled twice and the water from the first boiling was thrown away. After the meat had been boiled a second time, the water from the second boiling was used as a stock to make soup. Onion greens or the blood of animals was mixed with the stock, which was used as an after-meal tea. Hot stones, retrieved from ashes and the dirt blown, off were used to boil water. Water was put into a basket made from tightly woven split spruce roots, which was then put on the ground above the hot stones. Another method used to boil water was to dig a pit, and then line it with hide, or at times, grass. Hot stones, which served as the source of heat, were put on top. Spruce bark was used to cover the top of the pit in order to maintain the steam. The meat would be sliced into tiny pieces and dropped into the boiling water. Women served the meat directly on fresh poplar, the bark of birch and in dishes made of birch and solid wood. They used cutlery such as bone knives and spoons made of wood or sheep horn. Women preserved the meat by drying it in the sun in late September and October [18]. The Gitksan would skin and smoke lynx meat [25].

Lynx meat was described as light in color and similar to rabbit meat in taste [25]. Lynx flesh was regarded as “good meat” by the Fort Nelson Slave (Dene) [3]; the Mistissini Cree considered lynx “excellent eating” [6]. The Micmac (Mi'kmaq) of Conne River, Newfoundland reported that baked lynx tasted similar to rabbit [10]. The Upper Tanana of Alaska greatly valued lynx fat for cooking [23].

It is reported that a typical live weight of a lynx is 17 pounds, of which 6.8 pounds is edible [12].

Uses other than food

Many cultures used lynx pelt for clothing and other essentials. In fact, many of these cultures primarily hunted lynx for the pelt and only consumed lynx when other food sources were unavailable. These cultures include the Kootenai, Lillooet, Koyukon, Tahltan, Inupiat, Chipewyan, Red Earth Cree of Saskatchewan, The James Bay Cree and the Waswanipi Cree of Quebec and Micmac of Conne River, Newfoundland [7-12, 15-17, 19]. Tahltan of the Skitine Plateau, Bella Coola, and Micmac of Richibucto also trapped lynx for its fur [46, 47, 49]. The Tahltan used the hide to make clothing such as robes and headgear [46].

In addition to consuming lynx, the Nicola of interior British Columbia used the animal as bait when hunting other animals such as deer and mountain sheep [31].

Prior to the 1900s, lynx fur was preferred for making fine clothes because it is warm and light. In the early 1900s, the principal purpose for trapping lynx was the commercial fur trade [48].
Lynx played a very important part of the Vanta Kutchin economy: the fur trade in the early 1900s was vibrant, but slowed down later as lynx became scarce [13, 14].

Beliefs and taboos

A Tahltan legend describes the lynx having sexual relations with a woman. As a result, there were certain rules to follow in treating the lynx and in eating different parts of its carcass [9]. The Ahtna had several rituals connected with all furbearers, including the lynx. It was taboo to bring the meat and hide of the lynx through a door; rather, it was carried though a smoke hole (or, in later times, through a window). Before the lynx pelt had been dried, it was to be kept isolated. Also, any bones and flesh of the lynx that had not been consumed by humans were to be burned [27].

The Tutchone, Tagish and Tlingit all associate the lynx with the more malevolent animal spirits. It is thought that this is the reason they do not use the lynx on their crests. The Tagish believe that the lynx brings the north wind. During mating season, Tagish hunters occasionally call the lynx in order to bring them closer to camp. However, they believe that by doing so, they might run the risk of bringing the north wind. The Tagish and Inland Tlingit consider the lynx a very powerful animal spirit with the potential for harming humans. Its spirit is believed to be an animal spirit, which “sneaks around inside you”. They believe that it can possess a human and force him/her to perform evil or dangerous acts. Because of these associations, they follow certain precautions when skinning it. For instance, it is considered best practice to skin it at the location where it is captured. However, if it is frozen and has to be thawed out at camp, it must be skinned before the trapper goes to bed. If tradition is broken, any misfortune incurred to the hunter will be ascribed to this. A story is told of a Tagish man who did not skin a lynx before going to bed. He let it thaw overnight with its eyes frozen open. In the course of the night, his wife had a dream in which she saw the animal’s eyes gaze at her. She suffered a miscarriage two days later. It was thought that if tradition had been followed, the miscarriage would not have occurred. When killing a lynx, it is recommended that one apologize to the lynx and refer to him as “grandfather” [48].


Bobcat is reported to have been used by the Spokane, Coast Salish and Kalispel. The Spokane especially cherished its pelt, but also used the flesh to supplement food stores [42]. Bobcats were scarce in the Kalispel region, however it is documented that they consumed it and used the pelt to make clothes [41]. The Spokane hunted bobcats in winter using pitfalls and deadfalls [42]. The Coast Salish used traps to hunt bobcat [51].

Indigenous Peoples of Puget Sound were reported to have eaten ‘wildcat’ meat and used ‘wildcat’ fur to make clothing, which likely refers to bobcats. Wildcats were considered one of the tamahnous (black magic) animals [52]. The Stalo, Middle Columbia River Salish and Gulf of George Salish also were reported to consume wildcat on occasion [39, 53, 54]. Some Coast Salish found wildcat flesh inedible, while others consumed them when available: they did not purposefully hunt wildcat, but caught them should they be encountered [55]. The Spokane actively hunted wildcat [42]. The Salish used snares; the Spokane used deadfalls and pitfalls stationed along game trails [39, 42].


1.         Berkes F, Farkas CS: Eastern James Bay Cree Indians: Changing Patterns of Wild Food Use and Nutrition. In.; 1978.

2.         Halpin MM, Seguin M: Tsimshian Peoples: Southern Tsimshian, Coast Tsimshian, Nishga, and Gitksan. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast. edn. Edited by Suttles W. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1990: 267-271.

3.         Honigmann JJ: Ethnography and Acculturation of the Fort Nelson Slave. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1946.

4.         Osgood C: Material Culture: Food. In: Contributions to the Ethnography of the Kutchin. edn. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1936: 23-39.

5.         Rogers ES: Subsistence Areas of the Cree-Ojibwa of the Eastern Subarctic: A Preliminary Study. Contributions of Ethnology V 1967, No. 204:59-90.

6.         Rogers ES: The Quest for Food and Furs: The Mistassini Cree, 1953-1954. Ottawa: Museums of Canada; 1973.

7.         McFadyen Clark A: Koyukon. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 582-590.

8.         Meyer D: Appendix I: Plants, Animals and Climate; Appendix IV: Subsistence-Settlement Patterns. In: The Red Earth Crees, 1860-1960. Volume 1st edition, edn.: National Musem of Man Mercury Series; 1985: 175-185-200-223.

9.         Emmons GT: The Tahltan Indians, vol. Anthropological Publications Vol. IV No. 1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania: The Museum; 1911.

10.       Mackey MGA, Bernard L, Smith BS: The Micmacs of Conne River Newfoundland - A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Food: Its Procurement and Use. In.

11.       Berkes F, Mackenzie M: Cree Fish Names from Eastern James Bay, Quebec. Arctic 1978, 31(4):489-495.

12.       Elberg N, Hyman J, Hyman K, Salisbury RF: Not By Bread Alone: The Use of Subsistence Resources among James Bay Cree. In.; 1975.

13.       Balikci A: Game Distribution. In: Vunta Kutchin Social Change A Study of the People of Old Crow, Yukon Territory. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1963.

14.       Leechman D: Hunting, Fishing. In: The Vanta Kutchin Bulletin No 130, Anthropological Series No 33. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1954.

15.       Brunton BB: Kootenai. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 223-228.

16.       Turney-High HH: Ethnography of the Kutenai. Menasha, Wisconsin: American Anthropological Association; 1941.

17.       Teit JA: The Lillooet Indians, vol. Re-print of the 1906 ed; The Jesup North Pacific Expedition: Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History. New York: AMS Press Inc.; 1975.

18.       Honigmann JJ: The Kaska Indians: An Ethnographic Reconstruction. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1954.

19.       Smith JGE: Chipewyan. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 271-277.

20.       Wein EE, Freeman MMR: Frequency of Traditional Food Use by Three Yukon First Nations Living in Four Communities. Arctic 1995, Vol. 48, No. 2:161-171.

21.       Wein EE: Nutrient Intakes and Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians Near Wood Buffalo National Park. In.; 1989.

22.       Wein EE, Sabry JH, Evers FT: Food Consumption Patterns and Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians Near Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada. Arctic 1991, 44(3):196-205.

23.       McKennan RA: Economic Life. In: The Upper Tanana Indians. edn. New Haven: Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 55; 1959.

24.       Rogers ES: Subsistence. In: The Hunting Group-Hunting Territory Complex among the Mistassini Indians. edn. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada Bulletin No. 195; 1963: 32-53.

25.       The People of 'Ksan: Gathering What the Great Nature Provided. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, Ltd.; 1980.

26.       Bauer G: Fort George Cookbook; 1967.

27.       de Laguna F, McClellan C: Ahtna. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 641-650.

28.       Schaefer O, Steckle J: Dietary Habits and Nutritional Base of Native Populations of the Northwest Territories. Yellowknife: Government of the Northwest Territories; 1980.

29.       Teit JA (ed.): Part IV The Thompson Indians. New York; 1900.

30.       Oberg K: The Annual Cycle of Production. In: The Social Economy of the Tlingit Indians. edn.: University of Washington Press; 1973: 65.

31.       Wyatt D: Nicola. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 220-222.

32.       Teit JA: Part V The Lillooet Indians, vol. II. New York; 1906.

33.       Gabriel L: Food and Medicines of the Okanakanes. Okanagan Historical Society Annual Report 1954, No. 18:21-29.

34.       Snow JH: Ingalik. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 602-607.

35.       Mandelbaum DG: The Plains Cree: An Ethnographic, Historical, and Comparative Study, vol. 1st edition. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center; 1979.

36.       Rogers ES: Equipment for Securing Native Foods and Furs. In: The Material Culture of the Mistassini. edn.: National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 218; 1967: 67-88.

37.       Birket-Smith K, DeLaguna F. In: The Eyak Indians of the Copper River Delta, Alaska. edn. Kobenhavn: Levin & Munksgaard; 1938.

38.       Columbia GoB: Vol 3: Interior Salish. Victoria: British Columbia Department of Education; 1966.

39.       Miller J: Middle Columbia River Salishans. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 253-270.

40.       Burch ES, Jr.: Kotzebue Sound Eskimo. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 5: Arctic. edn. Edited by Damas D. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1984: 303-311.

41.       Lahren SL, Jr.: Kalispel. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 283-288.

42.       Ross JA: Spokane. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 271-282.

43.       Mackey MGA, Bernard L, Smith BS: Country Food Consumption by Selected Households of the Micmac in Conne River Newfoundland in 1985-86. In.; 1986.

44.       Mackey MGA, Orr RDM: An Evaluation of Household Country Food Use in Makkovik, Labrador, July 1980 - June 1981. Arctic 1987, 40(1):60-65.

45.       Berkes F, George PJ, Preston RJ, Hughes.A, Turner J, Cummins BD: Wildlife Harvesting and Sustainable Regional Native Economy in the Hudson and James Bay Lowland, Ontario. Arctic 1994, Vol. 47 No. 4:350-360.

46.       Albright S: Tahltan Ethnoarchaeology, vol. Department of Archaeology Publication Number 15. Burnaby, B.C.: Department of Archaeology: Simon Fraser University; 1984.

47.       Kennedy DID, Bouchard RT: Bella Coola. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast. edn. Edited by Suttles W. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1990: 323-325.

48.       McClellan C: My Old People Say: An Ethnographic Survey of Southern Yukon Territory-Part 1. Ottawa: National Musems of Canada; 1975.

49.       Speck FG, Dexter RW: Utilization of animals and plants by the Micmac Indians of New Brunswick. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 1951, 41(8):250-259.

50.       Kuhnlein HV: Traditional and Contemporary Nuxalk Foods. Nutrition Research 1984, 4:789-809.

51.       Ashwell R: Food, Fishing & Hunting; Cooking Methods. In: Coast Salish: Their Art, Culture and Legends. Volume 1st edition, edn. British Columbia: Hancock House Publishers Inc.; 1978: 28-55.

52.       Eells M: The Indians of Puget Sound: The Notebooks of Myron Eells. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1985.

53.       Barrett HG: Gulf of Georgia Salish: University of California; 1939.

54.       Duff W: The Upper Stalo Indians of the Fraser Valley, British Columbia. Victoria,B.C.: British Columbia Provincial Museum; 1952.

55.       Barnett HG: Food; Occupations. In: The Coast Salish of British Columbia. Volume 1st edition, edn. Eugene: University of Oregon; 1955: 59-107.

Lynx and Bobcat General

Lynx and Bobcat General

Lynx (Lynx canadensis) and bobcat (L. rufus) are two closely related member of the wild cat family, also including the cougar (Puma concolor). Together, lynx and bobcat are the only wild spotted cats that are not listed as endangered. Like all wild cats, they are not long-distance runners like the dogs, but they can be fast sprinter with an incredible balance. They are solitary hunters, perfectly adapted as ambush predators, with a strong musculature, a compact head with rounded ears, long canines, long limbs, and big paws equipped with retractable claws. Unlike the cougar, lynx and bobcat have a short tail and spotted fur patterns [1].


The lynx (Lynx canadensis) occur throughout the North American boreal forest, from coast to coast, with some populations extending into northern United States around the Rocky Mountains and the Great Lakes. They are almost separated geographically from the more southern bobcat.

Lynx have a long and dense grayish brown fur with long facial ruff and ear tufts. Their tail is short, unlike cougars, and has a complete black tip, unlike bobcats with a white under tail. Adults typically weigh 9.7 kg and males are only slightly larger than females.

Lynx are most often solitary, except for females and young and temporary breeding pairs. They mate in early spring and produce around 3 young born in a den about 65 days later. Young lynx remain with the mother until the next breeding season. They daily travel between 5-10 km over their large individual home range up to 300 square km. Their diet is mainly based on small mammals and birds, but can also included deer and beaver. 

Lynx are common, but their population follows a 10-year cycle from constantly increasing in abundance to an almost instantaneous crash similar to the one seen in the snowshoe hare, their primary prey [2].


The bobcat (Lynx rufus) is widely distributed and occurs in deserts, swamps, and mountains throughout North America southward from southern Canada. They are almost separated geographically from the more northern lynx.

Bobcats have a long and dense brownish fur with darker streaks and spots, whitish underparts, and black ear tufts. Their tail is short, unlike cougars, and is white under, unlike lynxs with a completely black tipped tail. Adult bobcats typically weigh 6.4 kg and males are quite larger than females. They live for up to around 10 years and can be quite abundant in some part of their range, up to almost 3 individuals per square km [2].


1.         Forsyth A: Mammals of North America: Temperate and arctic regions. Willowdale, ON: Firefly Books; 1999.

2.         Wilson DE, Ruff S: The Smithsonian book of North American mammals. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press; 1999.


Images provided below were obtained from the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History - North American Mammals. Available from
Credit: painting by Consie Powell from Kays and Wilson's Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press (2002)
Credit: IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature),
Credit: painting by Consie Powell from Kays and Wilson's Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press (2002)
Credit: Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy — Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International — CABS, World Wildlife Fund — US, and Environment Canada — WILDSPACE.