Animals -> Mammals -> Furbearers -> Muskrat

Muskrat

Hunting

Muskrat was usually hunted in winter and/or spring [11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 28, 43, 48, 49, 54, 55, 63, 73, 81, 83, 84, 87]. Traps (snare or steel), nets, spears, bows and arrows, and in recent times guns, were used for hunting muskrat [1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 37, 43, 48, 49, 52, 54, 63, 64, 74, 79, 80, 83, 84, 88-90].

The Southwestern Chippewa used baited steel traps positioned along the shores of lakes and streams in winter [52]. The Kalispel dug muskrat out of its burrow and used club or bow and arrow to kill it [42]. The Western Abenaki dug or drove muskrat out of its riverbank den and also trapped muskrat in its lake dwelling [37]. The Salish of Middle Columbia River used shellfish to bait muskrat [50].

The Tutchone, Tagish and Tlingit used spring-pole snares positioned in the grass along muskrat trails; later they switched to steel traps, which they placed beside muskrat houses after snow cover started to clear from ponds. They also shot muskrat, luring them into shooting range by cupping their hands on their mouths to form the whining noise of a young muskrat [46]. Others lured muskrat with a teasing, “kissing” sound when traveling on water. Some hunters would scare the animals out of their houses so that when they surfaced through the air holes, community members, such as the hunter’s wife and children, would kill them with spear or bow and arrow. The muskrat was also shot as it swam in the water of spilled-over ice [56]. Yukon Indigenous Peoples used nets in runways below the lake: the ice was tapped with a bone chisel to determine the location of a runway – if one was found, an opening was made and a babiche or root net was placed inside with a little stick in front of the net and when the rat touched the stick, the net was pulled out with the animal trapped inside [11].

Muskrat hunting on lakes with canoes was an important springtime activity for the Chalkyitsik Kutchin (Gwich’in) in Alaska. When they spotted the bobbing heads, they rowed to within shooting distance and shot them with rifles. The hunter also lured the animal by squeezing his lips together to make a couple of low squeaking noises resembling the sounds made during mating season. When the animal came close enough he was shot in the head. After these methods of hunting were banned in Alaska in 1969, they placed traps at muskrat water holes [12].

The Red Earth Cree of Saskatchewan caught muskrat at “pushups” (vegetable meal remains that muskrats carried up via snow cavities) using a spear or foot traps or placed foot traps in muskrat lodges [49]. The Mistissini Cree hunted muskrat with bow and arrow, however after the 1970s they captured them in steel traps or shot them with a rifle [54]. If the trap was placed in late spring, a scent was smeared on the log at both sides of the trap [84]. The Anishnabeg (Ojibway) (Anishinabek) used deadfalls and placed nets in rivers and lakes [69]. The Micmac (Mi'kmaq) shot muskrat from canoes and placed traps in ponds, marshes and rivers [21].

Preparation

An individual muskrat yields only a pound of flesh, but when caught in large numbers, muskrat forms a considerable volume of food, of which many cultures took advantage [12]. Muskrat flesh was reported to be tender and tasty. The animal was roasted and/or boiled for immediate consumption or smoked or dried for later consumption [2, 11, 12, 17, 46, 61, 73, 74, 76]. Aside from the flesh, other parts eaten included the brain, head, liver, tail and skull [20, 74, 76].

The Upper Tanana first hung the whole carcass over a fire until the fur was burned off and the skin roasted, after which they boiled it. They also dried muskrat for later use as dog food by skinning the carcass, splitting it in the middle and drying it whole [73]. In spring, the Koyukon had communal feasts of recently slaughtered muskrat, ducks and geese [48]. Chalkyitsik Kutchin considered muskrat a delicacy, but also fed the meat to their dogs [12, 93]. In 1847, Murray writes that he found the Kutchin preparing a feast of “a lot of muskrats, moose fat and wild onions stowed in a vessel of birch bark” [13]. Chandalar Kutchin children ate roasted muskrat tail as a snack [74].

The Slavey (Sahtu) are thought to have rendered fat from muskrat [92]. The Hare are reported to have considered muskrat a delicacy [93] and Dene are reported to have smoked the flesh [91].

The Cree, Chipewyan and Métis of Wood Buffalo National Park dried the excess muskrat meat and took it back to their communities [28]. The Chipewyan removed and discarded the stomach and intestines at the site of the slaughter [9].

When there were many muskrat, the Mistissini Cree also dried the flesh [54]. Since Micmac hunted muskrat primarily for the fur trade, they ate them at the point of capture and did not take them back to the community [21].

The Penobscot skinned, cleaned and put muskrat legs on skewers, leaving the rest of the body to hang. The skewer was thrust in the ground near a fire, and the carcass was rotated until it was well roasted. They cooked the entrails of the carcass by placing them in ashes, removing them when they were well roasted, rinsing them and eating them. A common spring meal they prepared when muskrat was abundant was sikpe′s∙u, a dish made by stewing slivers of muskrat flesh. The eyes, brain, tongue and tail were delicacies; the tails extremely sweet. They fried the tails in sheets of fat, which made them tender and moist and ate the skull after it had been boiled [76].

Beliefs and taboos

A few Tagish and inland Tlingit believed that the bones should be returned to the water, but from the Tagish annual cycle, it appears that the bodies were fed to dogs and it was just the head that was cleaned and burned. The animal does not seem to be high in the spirit power world of the Tutchone, Tagish and Tlingit; nor does it appear as sib crests in their cultures [46].

In Mistissini Cree culture, the main part of the animal relating to honor is the head. The muskrat head was usually given to a young boy, while adult hunters received the head of larger animals [63]. The Iroquois considered it taboo to place a muskrat carcass on the ground after it had been skinned; they believed that doing so would cause the muskrat to be insulted, resulting in few or no muskrats allowing themselves to be captured [64]. The Micmac did not throw muskrat bones to the dogs, believing that this would prevent the hunter from catching the animal again [16].

References

1.         Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: The Canadian Indian: Yukon and Northwest Territories. Ottawa: Information Canada; 1973.

2.         Thommesen H: Telling Time With Shadows: The Old Indian Ways. In: Bella Coola Man: More Stories of Clayton Mack. edn. Edited by Thommasen H. Madeira Park, B.C: Harbour Publishing; 1994: 24-45.

3.         Emmons GT: The Tahltan Indians, vol. Anthropological Publications Vol. IV No. 1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania: The Museum; 1911.

4.         Gabriel L: Food and Medicines of the Okanakanes. Okanagan Historical Society Annual Report 1954, No. 18:21-29.

5.         Honigmann JJ: The Kaska Indians: An Ethnographic Reconstruction. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1954.

6.         Honigmann JJ: Ethnography and Acculturation of the Fort Nelson Slave. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1946.

7.         Howard JH: The Plains Ojibwa or Bungi: Hunters and Warriors of the Northern Prairies with special reference to the Turtle Mountain Band, vol. Series: Anthropological papers (no.1). Vemilion, South Dakota: South Dakota Musem, University of South Dakota; 1965.

8.         Howard JH: The Canadian Sioux. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press; 1984.

9.         Irimoto T: Subsistence Activities. In: Chipewyan Ecology: Group Structure and Caribou Hunting System. Volume 1st edition, edn. Osaka, Japan: National Musem of Ethnology; 1981: 100-109.

10.       Mackey MGA: Nutrition: Does Access to Country Food Really Matter? In.; 1987.

11.       McClellan C: A History of the Yukon Indians; Part of the Land, Part of the Water. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre; 1987.

12.       Nelson RK: Hunters of the Northern Forest: Designs for Survival among the Alaskan Kutchin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1973.

13.       Osgood C: Material Culture: Food. In: Contributions to the Ethnography of the Kutchin. edn. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1936: 23-39.

14.       Prins HEL: The Mi'kmaq: Resistance, Accommodation, and Cultural Survival, vol. Series: Case studies in Cultural Anthropology. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers; 1996.

15.       Raby S, Bone RM, Shannon EN: An Historic and Ethnographic Account to the 1920's. In: The Chipewyan of The Stony Rapids Region; a study of their changing world with special attention focused upon caribou. Volume 1st edition, edn. Edited by Bone RM. Saskatoon: Institute for Northern Studies, University of Saskatchewan; 1973: 12-47.

16.       Stoddard NB: Micmac Foods, vol. re-printed from the Journal of Education February 1966. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Halifax Natural Science Museum; 1970.

17.       Turney-High HH: Ethnography of the Kutenai. Menasha, Wisconsin: American Anthropological Association; 1941.

18.       Wallis WD, Wallis RS: The Malecite Indians of New Brunswick. Ottawa: National Musem of Canada; The Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1957.

19.       Bauer G: Fort George Cookbook; 1967.

20.       Farkas CS: Survey of Northern Canadian Indian Dietary Patterns and Food Intake. In.; 1978.

21.       Mackey MGA, Bernard L, Smith BS: The Micmacs of Conne River Newfoundland - A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Food: Its Procurement and Use. In.

22.       Kuhnlein HV: Traditional and Contemporary Nuxalk Foods. Nutrition Research 1984, 4:789-809.

23.       Morrison N, Kuhnlein HV: Retinol Content of Wild Foods Consumed by the Sahtu (Hareskin) Dene/Metis. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1993, 6:10-23.

24.       Morrison NE, Receveur O, Kuhnlein HV, Appavoo DM, Soueida R, Pierrot P: Contemporary Sahtu Dene/Metis use of traditional and market food. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 1995, 34(3):197-210.

25.       Receveur O, Boulay M, Kuhnlein HV: Decreasing traditional food use affects diet quality for adult Dene/Metis in 16 communities of the Canadian Northwest Territories. Journal of Nutrition 1997, 127(11):2179-2186.

26.       Schaefer O, Steckle J: Dietary Habits and Nutritional Base of Native Populations of the Northwest Territories. Yellowknife: Government of the Northwest Territories; 1980.

27.       Szathmary EJE, Ritenbaugh C, Goodby CSM: Dietary Change and Plasma Glucose Levels in an Amerindian Population Undergoing Cultural Transition. Soc Sci Med 1987, 24(10):791-804.

28.       Wein EE: Nutrient Intakes and Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians Near Wood Buffalo National Park. In.; 1989.

29.       Wein EE, Sabry JH, Evers FT: Food Consumption Patterns and Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians Near Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada. Arctic 1991, 44(3):196-205.

30.       Wein EE, Freeman MMR: Frequency of Traditional Food Use by Three Yukon First Nations Living in Four Communities. Arctic 1995, Vol. 48, No. 2:161-171.

31.       Wein EE, Freeman MMR: Inuvialuit Food Use and Food Preferences in Aklavik, NorthWest Territories, Canada. Arct Med Res 1992, 51:159-172.

32.       Berkes F, George PJ, Preston RJ, Hughes.A, Turner J, Cummins BD: Wildlife Harvesting and Sustainable Regional Native Economy in the Hudson and James Bay Lowland, Ontario. Arctic 1994, Vol. 47 No. 4:350-360.

33.       Berkes F, Farkas CS: Eastern James Bay Cree Indians: Changing Patterns of Wild Food Use and Nutrition. In.; 1978.

34.       Brunton BB: Kootenai. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 223-228.

35.       Campbell ML, Diamant RMF, Macpherson BD, Halladay JL: The Contemporary Food Supply of Three Northern Manitoba Cree Communities. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1997, 88(2):105-108.

36.       Clifton JA: Potawatomi. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 725-736.

37.       Day GM: Western Abenaki. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 148-156.

38.       de Laguna F, McClellan C: Ahtna. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 641-650.

39.       Heidenreich CE: Huron. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 368-383.

40.       Heidenreich CE: The Huron: A Brief Ethnography. York: York University-Department of Geography; 1972.

41.       Helm J, Lurie NO: The Subsistence Economy of the Dogrib Indians of Lac La Martre in the Mackenzie District of the Northwest Territories. Ottawa: Northern Co-ordination and Research Centre: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1961.

42.       Lahren SL, Jr.: Kalispel. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 283-288.

43.       Lane RB: Chilcotin. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 402-407.

44.       MacLachlan BB: Tahltan. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 458-468.

45.       Mandelbaum DG: The Plains Cree: An Ethnographic, Historical, and Comparative Study, vol. 1st edition. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center; 1979.

46.       McClellan C: My Old People Say: An Ethnographic Survey of Southern Yukon Territory-Part 1. Ottawa: National Musems of Canada; 1975.

47.       McClellan C: Tutchone. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 493-498.

48.       McFadyen Clark A: Koyukon. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 582-590.

49.       Meyer D: Appendix I: Plants, Animals and Climate; Appendix IV: Subsistence-Settlement Patterns. In: The Red Earth Crees, 1860-1960. Volume 1st edition, edn.: National Musem of Man Mercury Series; 1985: 175-185-200-223.

50.       Miller J: Middle Columbia River Salishans. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 253-270.

51.       Nobmann ED, Mamleeva FY, Klachkova EV: A Comparison of the Diets of Siberian Chukotka and Alaska Native Adults and Recommendations for Improved Nutrition, a Survey of Selected Previous Studies. Arct Med Res 1994, 53:123-129.

52.       Ritzenthaler RE: Southern Chippewa. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 743-747.

53.       Rogers ES: Subsistence Areas of the Cree-Ojibwa of the Eastern Subarctic: A Preliminary Study. Contributions of Ethnology V 1967, No. 204:59-90.

54.       Rogers ES: The Quest for Food and Furs: The Mistassini Cree, 1953-1954. Ottawa: Museums of Canada; 1973.

55.       Ross JA: Spokane. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 271-282.

56.       Russel F: Explorations in the Far North. In: Explorations in the Far North. edn. Iowa: University of Iowa; 1898.

57.       Seaburg WR, Miller J: Tillamook. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast. edn. Edited by Suttles WP. Washington: Smithsonian Institution; 1990: 560-566.

58.       Slobodin R: Kutchin. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 514-518.

59.       Smith JGE: Chipewyan. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 271-277.

60.       Smith JGE: Western Woods Cree. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 256-262.

61.       Damas D (ed.): Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 5: Arctic. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1984.

62.       Speck FG, Dexter RW: Utilization of animals and plants by the Micmac Indians of New Brunswick. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 1951, 41(8):250-259.

63.       Tanner A: Bringing Home Animals: Religious Ideology and Mode of Production of the Mistassini Cree Hunters, vol. 1st edition. London: C. Hurst & Company; 1979.

64.       Waugh FW: Iroquois Foods and Food Preparation, vol. No. 12; Anthropological Series. Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau; 1916.

65.       Wein EE: The Traditional Food Supply of Native Canadians. Canadian Home Economics Journal 1994, 44(2):74-77.

66.       Wein EE, Sabry JH: Use of Country Foods by Native Canadians in the Taiga. Arct Med Res 1988, 47(1):134-138.

67.       The People of 'Ksan: Gathering What the Great Nature Provided. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, Ltd.; 1980.

68.       Berkes F, Mackenzie M: Cree Fish Names from Eastern James Bay, Quebec. Arctic 1978, 31(4):489-495.

69.       Clifton JA, Cornell GL, McClurken JM: People of The Three Fires: The Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan. Grand Rapids, Michigan: The Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council; 1986.

70.       Elberg N, Hyman J, Hyman K, Salisbury RF: Not By Bread Alone: The Use of Subsistence Resources among James Bay Cree. In.; 1975.

71.       Feit HA: The Future of Hunters within Nation States: Anthropology and the James Bay Cree. In: Politics and History in Band Societies. edn. Edited by Leacock E, Lee R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982: 373-411.

72.       Leechman D: Hunting, Fishing. In: The Vanta Kutchin Bulletin No 130, Anthropological Series No 33. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1954.

73.       McKennan RA: Economic Life. In: The Upper Tanana Indians. edn. New Haven: Yale University Publications in Anthropology Number 55; 1959.

74.       McKennan RA: Getting a Living. In: The Chandalar Kutchin. edn. New York: Arctic Intitue of North America, Technical Paper No. 17; 1965.

75.       Rogers ES: Subsistence. In: The Hunting Group-Hunting Territory Complex among the Mistassini Indians. edn. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada Bulletin No. 195; 1963: 32-53.

76.       Speck FG. In: Penobscot Man The Life History of a Forest Tribe in Maine. edn. USA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1940.

77.       Friesen TM, Arnold CD: Zooarchaeology of a focal resource: Dietary importance of Beluga Whales to the Precontact Mackenzie Inuit. Arctic 1995, 48(1):22-30.

78.       Morrison DA: The Kugaluk Site and the Nuvorugmiut: The Archaeology and History of a Nineteenth-Century Mackenzie Inuit Society. Hull, Quebec: National Musems of Canada; 1988.

79.       Balikci A: Game Distribution. In: Vunta Kutchin Social Change A Study of the People of Old Crow, Yukon Territory. edn. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources; 1963.

80.       Birket-Smith K, DeLaguna F. In: The Eyak Indians of the Copper River Delta, Alaska. edn. Kobenhavn: Levin & Munksgaard; 1938.

81.       Feit HA: Waswanipi Realities and Adaptations: Resource Management and Cognitive Structure. In.; 1978.

82.       Newcomb WW: North American Indians: An Anthropological Perspective. Pacific Palisades, California: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc.; 1974.

83.       Oberg K: The Annual Cycle of Production. In: The Social Economy of the Tlingit Indians. edn.: University of Washington Press; 1973: 65.

84.       Rogers ES: Equipment for Securing Native Foods and Furs. In: The Material Culture of the Mistassini. edn.: National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 218; 1967: 67-88.

85.       Burch ES, Jr.: Kotzebue Sound Eskimo. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 5: Arctic. edn. Edited by Damas D. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1984: 303-311.

86.       Davis SD: Prehistory of Southeastern Alaska. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7: Northwest Coast. edn. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1990: 197-202.

87.       Helm J: Dogrib. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 291-299.

88.       Brumbach HJ, Jarvenpa R: Women the Hunter: Ethnoarchaeological Lessons from Chipewyan Life-Cycle Dynamics. In: Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica. Volume 1st edition, edn. Edited by Claassen C, Joyce RA. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1997: 20-25.

89.       Palmer G: Coeur d'Alene. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 12: Plateau. edn. Edited by Walker DE, Jr. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1998: 313-318.

90.       Snow DR: Eastern Abenaki. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 15: Northeast. edn. Edited by Trigger BG. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1978: 137-139.

91.       Kuhnlein HV, Appavoo DM, Morrison N, Soueida R, Pierrot P: Use and nutrient composition of traditional Sahtu (Hareskin) Dene/Metis food. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1994, 7:144-157.

92.       Asch MI: Slavey. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 338-341.

93.       Savishinsky JS, Hara HS: Hare. In: Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6: Subarctic. edn. Edited by Helm J. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 1981: 314-347.

The muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) is a semi-aquatic rodent occurring in brackish or freshwater lakes, ponds, streams, and marshes across most of North America, except in the Arctic tundra and southern United States. They are the largest member of the largest family of mammals, including mice, rats, voles, and lemmings.

Muskrats are dark brown with paler underside and have long guard hairs over a dense, soft fur and a long, narrow, and hairless tail. They have large and partially webbed hind feet with stiff hairs along toes to aid in swimming. They can remain under water for feeding dives lasting up to 15 minutes. They are much smaller than beavers, with adult muskrats typically weighing 2 kg. The name muskrat refers to their musky scent, which is especially strong during the breeding season.

Muskrats build floating houses made of vegetation or occupy dens along water banks. Muskrats have a high reproductive potential, breeding for the first time in their first year of life, having a short gestation of less than 30 days, and producing 2 to 6 litters per year, with 6 or 7 young per litter. They feed on a variety of aquatic vegetation, but also on fish, crustacean, snails, and even young birds.  

In good habitats, muskrat density can reach over 150 individuals per hectare, but numbers eventually die off, as the environment becomes depleted of resources individuals die of predation, parasites, and diseases. Muskrat predators are diverse, including mammal carnivores in general, mink in particular, and some of the larger birds of prey.

Reference

Wilson DE, Ruff S: The Smithsonian book of North American mammals. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press; 1999.

 

Images provided below were obtained from the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History - North American Mammals. Available from http://www.mnh.si.edu/mna/.
Muskrat
Credit: painting by Todd Zalewski from Kays and Wilson's Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press (2002)
Credit: Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy — Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International — CABS, World Wildlife Fund — US, and Environment Canada — WILDSPACE.